Combating Metric Conventionalism
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Revisiting Quine on Truth by Convention
In “Truth by Convention” W.V. Quine gave an influential argument against logical conventionalism. Even today his argument is often taken to decisively refute logical conventionalism. Here I break Quine’s arguments into two—(i) the super-task argument and (ii) the regress argument— and argue that while these arguments together refute implausible explicit versions of conventionalism, they cannot ...
متن کاملExplaining Logical Necessity1
Plan: I: Some facts about logical necessity stated. II: Not all necessity is logical. III: The need for an explanation. IV: Formalists attempt unsuccessfully to reduce logic to syntax. V: The no-sense theory of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus merely reformulates the problem. VI: Crude conventionalism is circular. VII: Extreme conventionalism is more sophisticated. VIII: It yields some important insigh...
متن کاملConventions’ Revenge: Davidson, Derangement, and Dormativity
Davidson advocates a radical and powerful form of anti-conventionalism, on which the scope of a semantic theory is restricted to the most local of contexts: a particular utterance by a particular speaker. I argue that this hyper-localism undercuts the explanatory grounds for his assumption that semantic meaning is systematic, which is central, among other things, to his holism. More importantly...
متن کامل- qc / 0 30 90 23 v 2 2 7 N ov 2 00 4 A modified - Lorentz - Transformation based gravity model confirming basic GRT experiments .
Implementing Poincaré’s geometric conventionalism a scalar Lorentz-covariant gravity model is obtained based on gravitationally modified Lorentz transformations (or GMLT). The modification essentially consists of an appropriate space-time and momentum-energy scaling (“normalization”) relative to a nondynamical flat background geometry according to an isotropic, nonsingular gravitational affecti...
متن کاملAuthors, Intentions and Literary Meaning
This article discusses the relationship (or lack thereof) between authors’ intentions and the meaning of literary works. It considers the advantages and disadvantages of Extreme and Modest Actual Intentionalism, Conventionalism, and two versions of Hypothetical Intentionalism, and discusses the role that one’s theoretical commitments about the robustness of linguistic conventions and the public...
متن کامل